An analysis in conjunction with Solar Done Right of the pitfalls of a solar development policy that could target millions of acres of public land
by Janine Blaeloch
With 253 million acres in BLM-managed lands alone, it may seem that the public lands, and their potential for use, are endless. Yet much of this area is already damaged or fragmented by mining, urban encroachment, oil and gas operations, livestock grazing, motorized recreation, and other uses. Large, contiguous areas that retain their ecological integrity are increasingly rare: these are some of the areas most acutely threatened by large-scale uses such as industrial solar.
A New Threat to Public Lands
by Janine Blaeloch, Western Lands Project, and Katie Fite, Western Watersheds Project, May 2006
In recent years, a notable change has materialized in wilderness campaigns and legislation. Traditionally, wilderness legislation has simply designated the boundaries of the newly-protected areas and might have included “release” language that dropped other nearby areas from protection. But while past wilderness bills entailed compromises, a new breed of compromise has emerged, with wilderness designations tied to complex land-use legislation addressing issues that go far beyond the wilderness boundaries.This trend has serious, negative implications for public lands policy and could have devastating consequences for Wilderness. These deals create a quid pro quo situation wherein wilderness protection is essentially “paid for” with balancing provisions in the same piece of legislation that facilitate development, privatization, and intensified land use – even in the very “wilderness” set aside in the deals.
If this trend continues, the days of the stand-alone wilderness bill, along with the strict observance of the letter and spirit of the Wilderness Act, may become relics of the past. We write this paper as advocates for public land and against its privatization and degradation. We also write outof concern for what quid pro quo wilderness may say about and mean to the future of grassroots environmental activism. In the last several months, dozens of grassroots groups and individual activists have joined us inexpressing concern about the new wilderness phenomenon, and in issuing this analysis we hope to widen the discussion. In this paper, we describe several examples of quid pro quo wilderness in Oregon, Nevada, and Idaho, look at the implications for public land policy, and, in the case of the Owyhee Initiative, set the context and anticipate the impact on the ground.
Our Latest Newsletter
Farm Bill Opens up Millions of Acres to Fast-Track Logging • House Republicans still don't like public land • Congress nullifies court decision on rebuilt structure in Wilderness
Your generosity helps Western Lands Project keep public lands public. To make a secure donation online with a credit card via PayPal®, please click on the Donate button below:
You can also donate by check, learn about membership, and find other ways to contribute on our "Donate" page.